Stonkpile/
Tessera
76 out of 100 for the market around tOpenAI: $742k you can sell into, $174k of volume in a day, 2 pools and a perp on Hyperliquid. It rates the market, never the company.
tOpenAI contractcheck it on Solscan
Each part is scored out of 10 and carries its own weight, so ten across all four is exactly 100. Nothing here is about the company, or about whether the price is fair.
Depth is read from indexed AMM pools. Market makers quoting from their own inventory, request-for-quote venues and exchange order books can all fill a trade this score cannot see, so a thin pool does not always mean a hard exit. What the rating covers
Issued through an SPV structure according to third-party reviews, with no lock-up. We could not read a statement from Tessera itself on what a holder can redeem a token for.
Not stated in a source we could read.
Read 2026-10-04 from Third-party comparison of pre-IPO platforms. source. Terms change, so check them before you act on this.
Five arithmetic checks on the tokenized stock itself, before you look at anything quoted against it.
Metadata is served from Tessera's own domain, which is how this index separates real tokenized stocks from the hundreds of lookalikes that simply put the name in their title.
Deep enough that a normal trade will not move the price much.
Pyth publishes an always-on price for OPENAI, so there is something independent to check the on-chain price against at any hour.
Only two venues. Liquidity is concentrated.
Widely held.
These are arithmetic checks on public data, not advice. They tell you what the numbers look like, not what to do about them.
Every market we found behind tOpenAI, deepest first, each one a link straight to that pool rather than to a front page. The depth figure is what is sitting in the pool now, which is roughly what you could sell into before the price moves against you.
$742k across 2 pools, and it does not move between them: a sale bigger than the deepest one costs you more than the top line suggests.
Turnover is 24-hour volume divided by the liquidity behind it. Anything far above about 5x is churning faster than real demand usually does. Each row carries the coin’s contract address so you can copy the right one. It identifies the coin and says nothing about whether it is any good.
| Coin | Venue | Liquidity | 24h volume | Turnover | 24h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 FROGE | raydium | $50k | $994 | 0.0x | -14.0% |
| 2 DOTS | raydium | $12k | $424 | 0.0x | -2.3% |
| 3 OpenSI | raydium | $9k | $270 | 0.0x | -8.3% |
| 4 PAL | raydium | $8k | $162 | 0.0x | — |
| 5 OAI | raydium | $9k | $112 | 0.0x | -5.0% |
| 6 froges | raydium | $8k | $53 | 0.0x | -2.5% |
| 7 GOBLIN | raydium | $17k | $27 | 0.0x | -3.7% |
| 8 ASTEROIDS | raydium | $6k | $23 | 0.0x | — |
| 9 o | raydium | $8k | $4 | 0.0x | -1.7% |
| 10 AI | raydium | $6k | $2 | 0.0x | — |
FROGE is the largest coin quoted against tOpenAI right now. Same checks, applied to it.
Volume is proportionate to the liquidity behind it, which is what organic trading looks like.
Thin. Small trades only.
Has been trading long enough to have a track record.
These are arithmetic checks on public data, not advice. They tell you what the numbers look like, not what to do about them.